Adam Chadaj vs Matteo Dellagiacoma Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L L L L L
Form
L L L W L L L L W LH2H: Chadaj 2 - 0 Dellagiacoma
They have played 4 sets in total, with Chadaj winning 4 and Dellagiacoma winning 0. The last match between Chadaj and Dellagiacoma was at the Qatar F6, 15-12-2014, Q1 round, Hard with Adam Chadaj getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adam Chadaj | 2 |
| Matteo Dellagiacoma | 0 |
Qatar F6(15-12-2014)
6
2
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gaston VS Hanfmann PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruse VS Kostovic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Chadaj VS Dellagiacoma H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Chadaj VS Dellagiacoma H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adam Chadaj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Piotr Matuszewski
Player
Adam Chadaj
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
2
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Adam Chadaj
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Torebko
Player
Adam Chadaj
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Chadaj
Player
Luca George Tatomir
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Chadaj
Player
George Tsivadze
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Adam Chadaj
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
15
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Adam Chadaj
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavel Filin
Player
Adam Chadaj
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Dellagiacoma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 5-7 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nikola Mektic
Player
Matteo Dellagiacoma
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Dellagiacoma
Player
Matteo Marfia
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (349/246) | Win/Loss | 41% (15/22) |
| 58% (774/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 43% (35/47) |
| 54% (6471/5593) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (360/387) |
| 60% (96/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) |
| 59% (212/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) |
| 54% (41/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 67 | Aces Total | 5 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 222 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 515.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 319.27 |
| 60% (2324/3862) | 1st Serve % | 55% (91/166) |
| 63% (1464/2324) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (65/91) |
| 45% (685/1538) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (34/75) |
| 48% (205/425) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
| 44% (1622/3691) | Return Points Win % | 35% (57/164) |
| 25% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (10/14) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (94/90) | Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 64% (242/139) | Futures W/L | 42% (14/19) |
| 59% (344/581) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (65/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 50% (76/151) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 89% (343/305) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (17/14) |
| 11% (343/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) |
| 17% (252/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (20/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
